Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+Ptsin1Dwy8MAK_=Z0-8ALh3Xkoo+6vt4oTrfWpkDrxZ4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:09 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Shubham, > > The different meanings of the terms "parameter" versus "option" were > discussed in a recent thread [1], and that has made me reconsider this > generated columns feature. > > Despite being in the PUBLICATION section "WITH ( publication_parameter > [= value] [, ... ] )", I think that 'publish_generated_columns' is an > "option" (not a parameter). > > We should update all those places that are currently calling it a parameter: > - commit messages > - docs > - comments > - etc. > > ====== > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuiRydyrYfMzR1OxOnVJf-_G8OBCLdyqu8jJ8si51d%2BEQ%40mail.gmail.com > It seems there are differing opinions on that other thread about what term to use. Probably, it is best to just leave the above suggestion alone for now. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: