Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+PtR85_yD-jJ08+ma5EsS6SEgAahRmXH7dsGA=ornhKAsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~) (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory leak in WAL sender with pgoutput (v10~)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 5:47 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 03:29:56PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > We can look at it from a different angle which is that the > > FreePublication(s) relies on how the knowledge of Publication > > structure is built. So, it doesn't look weird if we think from that > > angle. > > OK, I can live with that on all the stable branches with an extra > list free rather than a deep list free. > > I agree that the memory handling of this whole area needs some rework > to make such leaks harder to introduce in the WAL sender. Still, > let's first solve the problem at hand :) > > So how about the attached that introduces a FreePublication() matching > with GetPublication(), used to do the cleanup? Feel free to comment. > -- Perhaps the patch can use foreach_ptr macro instead of foreach? ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: