Hi Amit
I have rebased, split, and addressed (most of) the review comments of
the v15-0003 patch.
So the previous v15-0003 patch is now split into three as follows:
- v16-0001-Support-2PC-txn-spoolfile.patch
- v16-0002-Support-2PC-txn-pgoutput.patch
- v16-0003-Support-2PC-txn-subscriber-tests.patch
PSA.
Of course the previous v15-0001 and v15-0002 are still required before
applying these v16 patches. Later (v17?) we will combine these again
with what Ajin is currently working on to give the full suite of
patches which will have a consistent version number.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 4:41 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Few Comments on v15-0003-Support-2PC-txn-pgoutput
> ===============================================
> 1. This patch needs to be rebased after commit 644f0d7cc9 and requires
> some adjustments accordingly.
Done.
>
> 2.
> if (flags != 0)
> elog(ERROR, "unrecognized flags %u in commit message", flags);
>
> +
> /* read fields */
> commit_data->commit_lsn = pq_getmsgint64(in);
>
> Spurious line.
Fixed.
>
> 3.
> @@ -720,6 +722,7 @@ apply_handle_commit(StringInfo s)
> replorigin_session_origin_timestamp = commit_data.committime;
>
> CommitTransactionCommand();
> +
> pgstat_report_stat(false);
>
> Spurious line
Fixed.
>
> 4.
> +static void
> +apply_handle_prepare_txn(LogicalRepPrepareData * prepare_data)
> +{
> + Assert(prepare_data->prepare_lsn == remote_final_lsn);
> +
> + /* The synchronization worker runs in single transaction. */
> + if (IsTransactionState() && !am_tablesync_worker())
> + {
> + /* End the earlier transaction and start a new one */
> + BeginTransactionBlock();
> + CommitTransactionCommand();
> + StartTransactionCommand();
>
> There is no explanation as to why you want to end the previous
> transaction and start a new one. Even if we have to do so, we first
> need to call BeginTransactionBlock before CommitTransactionCommand.
TODO
>
> 5.
> - * Handle STREAM COMMIT message.
> + * Common spoolfile processing.
> + * Returns how many changes were applied.
> */
> -static void
> -apply_handle_stream_commit(StringInfo s)
> +static int
> +apply_spooled_messages(TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn)
> {
> - TransactionId xid;
>
> Can we have a separate patch for this as this can be committed before
> main patch. This is a refactoring required for the main patch.
Done.
>
> 6.
> @@ -57,7 +63,8 @@ static void pgoutput_stream_abort(struct
> LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
> static void pgoutput_stream_commit(struct LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
> ReorderBufferTXN *txn,
> XLogRecPtr commit_lsn);
> -
> +static void pgoutput_stream_prepare_txn(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
> + ReorderBufferTXN *txn, XLogRecPtr prepare_lsn);
>
> Spurious line removal.
Fixed.
---
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia