Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist
От | Peter Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHut+Ps8Xq-e5XL=AejiX-pF0417Vc7tMrh+YuZjBt7ozjvPUA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_createsubscriber: publication-name and subscription-name options do not exist (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hi Shubham, I took a look at the patch v2-0001. Here are some review comments. 1. Previously when this DOCS page was referring to the --publication and --subscription it was calling those "switches". I don't know why, but it does. Maybe calling them "options" is ok too, but personally (for consistency with the above) I would've stuck with the same "switches" terminology. 1a. /If --publication option is not specified.../If the --publication switch is not specified.../ or maybe just omit the term entirely /If --publication option is not specified.../If --publication is not specified.../ ~ 1b. /If --subscription option is not specified.../If the --subscription switch is not specified.../ or maybe just omit the term entirely /If --subscription option is not specified.../If --subscription is not specified.../ ~~~ 2. Although the patch addresses the reported problems, I think the same problem exists for "replication-slot-name". e.g. the DOCS are saying "If replication-slot-name is not specified..." although there is no such thing -- it is called "--replication-slot" So, the patch should also be fixing that one using the same consistent wording. e.g. /If replication-slot-name is not specified.../If the --replication-slot switch is not specified.../ or /If replication-slot-name is not specified.../If --replication-slot is not specified.../ ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: