Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Willy-Bas Loos
Тема Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Дата
Msg-id CAHnozTg0VRHXUwa8diyCbh3Mc0n4Hr5ap3UNJab+DLNs2yN7VA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
thanks!
i also see that it's available from apt.postgresql.org, including lots of postgres versions!

WBL



On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
> I want to upgrade from londiste2 to londiste3.
> Skytools 2 has a -modules- package.
> We're using postgres 8.4 at the moment, so we use the package
> skytools-modules-8.4.
>
> Now i'm looking at londiste3 in Debian experimental, but there are no
> 'modules' packages. Don't i need one anymore?
> (hope this is not off-topic for the list)

It's renamed to postgresql-X.Y-pgq3.

--
marko




--
"Quality comes from focus and clarity of purpose" -- Mark Shuttleworth

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marko Kreen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: don't i need a -modules package for londiste3?
Следующее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UPDATE using 3 medium-sized tables causes runaway hash table and fills disk