Re: a lot of shared buffers hit when planning for a simple query with primary access path

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От James Pang
Тема Re: a lot of shared buffers hit when planning for a simple query with primary access path
Дата
Msg-id CAHgTRfexv++pDhFzGbKzegk+qyW3eB9cLd-g88=EQ5t7BEMh5g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: a lot of shared buffers hit when planning for a simple query with primary access path  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: a lot of shared buffers hit when planning for a simple query with primary access path
Список pgsql-performance
    we have a daily job to do vacuumdb including catalog tables,  and in same database , I did similar query with where=pk on another table and shared buffer access is very small, if catalog table bloat,  should see similar shared buffer access when planning for other tables ,right?  How to get more details about this planning ? 

        relname         |          last_vacuum          |         last_analyze
-------------------------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------
 pg_statistic            | 2024-06-30 01:13:08.703291+00 |
 pg_attribute            | 2024-06-30 01:14:48.061235+00 | 2024-07-01 01:11:49.377759+00
 pg_class                | 2024-06-30 01:15:09.984027+00 | 2024-07-01 01:12:05.160881+00
 pg_type                 | 2024-06-30 01:15:11.139648+00 | 2024-07-01 01:12:05.32726+00
 ...
(62 rows)

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> 於 2024年7月1日週一 下午6:52寫道:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 at 22:20, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> The planners get min/max range from indexes. So some user's indexes can be bloated too with similar effect

I considered that, but it doesn't apply to this query as there are no
range quals.

David

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: