Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18
| От | xingguo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHZOkpZSfofgpZnV1JgroTbOS7z9S45-wsvoMxj6YegxmDH1Vg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18 (Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Xuneng and Michael,
Thank you so much for the quick response and for fixing the issue. I saw that the commit has already been merged into master.
I’d like to ask whether this fix will be included in the patch release for version 14 - specifically 14.20. I noticed the commit mentions Backpatch-through: 13, and I want to confirm whether that means the fix will be backpatched to version 13 and all subsequent supported versions.
Thanks again!
Best regards,
Xingguo
Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>于2025年11月4日 周二17:01写道：
Hi, Michael!
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 12:52 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 08:44:55AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 8:17 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >> Thanks, that looks sensible. I'll revisit what you have at the
> >> beginning of next week (local Tuesday) with a backpatch down to v13 in
> >> mind. If others have comments and/or objections, please feel free to
> >> chime in.
> >
> > It's an oversight. Thanks for catching it.
>
> Phew, done.
Thanks for pushing the patches!
> While looking at the whole thing, I was wondering if we
> should strengthen a little bit what's expected of the context for some
> of the callers of the WAL routines, like XLogShutdownWalRcv(), and
> finished with the bonus patch attached. What do you think?
The change LGTM — it ensures that the walreceiver’s lifecycle is
orchestrated entirely by the startup process.
Best,
Xuneng
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: