On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:47 AM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:20 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>
>> lines are supposed to align vertically. With your patch, the first line
>> would have variable length depending on the command.
>
>
> Yes, that is a good point. Aligning those would be quite tricky, what if we just kept a standard width for the
closingquery? Probably the 24 stars we currently have to match "QUERY", which it appears nobody has changed for
translationpurposes yet anyway. (If I am reading the code correctly, it would be up to the translators to maintain the
verticalalignment).
I think it's easier to keep the widths balanced than constant (patch
version included here), but if we needed to squeeze the opening string
to a standard width that would be possible without too much trouble.
The internal comment strings seem to be a bit more of a pain if we
wanted all of the comments to be the same width, as we'd need a table
or something so we can compute the longest string width, etc; doesn't
seem worth the convolutions IMHO.
No changes to Greg's patch, just keeping 'em both so cfbot stays happy.
David