Re: Tab completion for large objects
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tab completion for large objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwHfzMsFJt3-q5ixGsa0Mu9peqLMv+7_OmnLGLRpkuYggQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tab completion for large objects (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 7:46 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > > > > On 2025/07/09 3:50, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > > > I noticed that psql's tab completion suggested TO immediately after > > GRANT ... ON LARGE OBJECT, and not after ON LARGE OBJECT <oid>. This is > > because LARGE OBJECT is the only two-word object type, so it thinks > > LARGE is the object type and OBJECT is the name. Attached are three > > patches that address this and other LO-related tab completion issues: > > > > 1. Tab complete OBJECT after GRANT|REVOKE ... ON LARGE, and TO/FROM > > after GRANT|REVOKE ... ON LARGE OBJECT > > Thanks for the patches! > > Regarding the 0001 patch, Nagata-san already proposed a similar patch in [1]. > His version handles not only "LARGE OBJECT" but also another two-word object type, > "FOREIGN SERVER". I think it's worth applying patch 0002 and part of 0001, so I've merged those changes into a single patch. Patch attached. Any thoughts? + else if (TailMatches("LARGE")) + COMPLETE_WITH("OBJECT"); It seems the "ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES ... LARGE" case was missed here. In that context, we should complete with "OBJECTS" instead of "OBJECT". I've fixed that in the patch. As for patch 0003, I'm not sure it adds much value. It's probably hard for most users to choose the correct OID from the list of large object OIDs provided by tab-completion. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: