Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwHei6Y92YaL=gVmXiMPTYY+5xu177g6xjOUTrne4uSSjQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I found several problems in pg_receivexlog, e.g., memory leaks,
>>> file-descripter leaks, ..etc. The attached patch fixes these problems.
>>>
>>> ISTM there are still some other problems in pg_receivexlog, so I'll
>>> read it deeply later.
>>
>> While pg_basebackup background process is streaming WAL records,
>> if its replication connection is terminated (e.g., walsender in the server
>> is accidentally terminated by SIGTERM signal), pg_basebackup ends
>> up failing to include all required WAL files in the backup. The problem
>> is that, in this case, pg_basebackup doesn't emit any error message at all.
>> So an user might misunderstand that a base backup has been successfully
>> taken even though it doesn't include all required WAL files.
>
> Ouch. That is definitely a bug if it behaves that way.
>
>
>> To fix this problem, I think that, when the replication connection is
>> terminated, ReceiveXlogStream() should check whether we've already
>> reached the stop point by calling stream_stop() before returning TRUE.
>> If we've not yet (this means that we've not received all required WAL
>> files yet), ReceiveXlogStream() should return FALSE and
>> pg_basebackup should emit an error message.  Comments?
>
> Doesn't it already return false because it detects the error of the
> connection? What's the codepath where we end up returning true even
> though we had a connection failure? Shouldn't that end up under the
> "could not read copy data" branch, which already returns false?

You're right. If the error is detected, that function always returns false
and the error message is emitted (but I think that current error message
"pg_basebackup: child process exited with error 1" is confusing....),
so it's OK. But if walsender in the server is terminated by SIGTERM,
no error is detected and pg_basebackup background process gets out
of the loop in ReceiveXlogStream() and returns true.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema version management
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog