Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHGQGwHAPXexiGaHMkDDRF7cPBr_3fgCNdT4n2+1UjaEU++BAQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL (Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 3:00 AM Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 9:39 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>
>> Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru@gmail.com> writes:
>> > The ECPG application crashes with a segmentation fault when calling
>> > specific deallocation or prepared statement functions without an
>> > established database connection. This is caused by a missing NULL check on
>> > the connection handle before attempting to access it.
>>
>> Hmm ... poking around, I see several other places that aren't checking
>> the result of ecpg_get_connection. Shouldn't we tighten them all?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
>
> I agree. I’ve reviewed all occurrences of ecpg_get_connection() and noted that, in most instances, it is followed by
ecpg_init(),which validates the connection and returns immediately if the connection is NULL.
Why did you add this check instead of calling ecpg_init()?
Wouldn't it be better and sufficient to use ecpg_init() to validate
the connection?
+ con = ecpg_get_connection(connection_name);
+ if (!con)
+ {
+ ecpg_raise(lineno, ECPG_NO_CONN, ECPG_SQLSTATE_CONNECTION_DOES_NOT_EXIST,
+ connection_name ? connection_name : ecpg_gettext("NULL"));
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: