On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:52 PM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
> V3 looks good to me.
Thanks for reviewing the patch!
> > Yeah, I agree that if certain GUCs can break logical replication,
> > we should enforce "safe" values, just as we currently do for datestyle.
> > And if any other GUCs can cause the issue, they could affect
> > postgres_fdw etc, so the fix would need to be broader.
>
> Just want to clarify if you mean you will handle this in a future patch?
I don't currently know of any other parameters that must be forced for
logical replication or postgres_fdw. But if we identify any, I'm happy to
review a patch that adds the necessary handling.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao