Re: Logical replication launcher did not automatically restart when got SIGKILL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Logical replication launcher did not automatically restart when got SIGKILL
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwGV77nbVfFFYeK96qf+9u8Yw9ddXhN5hcuvuHoSqq110A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Logical replication launcher did not automatically restart when got SIGKILL  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Logical replication launcher did not automatically restart when got SIGKILL
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 6:58 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 8:51 AM cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The v1-0002 in [1] will call ReportBackgroundWorkerExit() which will send SIGUSR1 to 'bgw_notify_pid', but it may
alreadyexit in HandleChildCrash(), is this ok? 
> >
>
> Shall ReportBackgroundWorkerExit() be skipped for 'crashed' background worker?
>
> If we look at code prior to commit 28a520c0b77, there we were setting
> 'rw_crashed_at' in CleanupBackgroundWorker() and then
> HandleChildCrash() was resetting the pid and exiting with no
> additional processing.

It seems we don't need to set rw_crashed_at in crash cases,
since it's always reset to 0 by ResetBackgroundWorkerCrashTimes()
in restart-after-crash code. So, the only additional step we need may be
resetting rw_pid to 0.

Instead of modifying CleanupBackend() to do this, another option
could be to reset rw_pid during restart-after-crash code, for example,
inside ResetBackgroundWorkerCrashTimes(). Thought?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: