On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-06-14 04:56:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>> > * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> >> > On 2013-06-12 07:53:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> >> >> The attached patch fixes this problem. It just changes walsender so that it
>> >> >> waits for all the outstanding WAL records to be replicated to the standby
>> >> >> before closing the replication connection.
>> >> >
>> >> > Imo this is a fix that needs to get backpatched... The code tried to do
>> >> > this but failed, I don't think it really gives grounds for valid *new*
>> >> > concerns.
>> >>
>> >> +1 (without having looked at the code itself, it's definitely a
>> >> behaviour that needs to be fixed)
>> >
>> > Yea, I was also thinking it would be reasonable to backpatch this; it
>> > really looks like a bug that we're allowing this to happen today.
>> >
>> > So, +1 on a backpatch for me.
>>
>> +1. I think that we can backpatch to 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3.
>
> I marked the patch as ready for committer.
Committed. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao