Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwFpEHuBe2AnV-9ntqKXOeqr80rh_+nmNPMwPOYH19P3gQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:22:59 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAD21AoAG88zYUwhV9L5muNX-qPSB+AgzerFDD0JDDVoM25gKKw@mail.gmail.com>
>> >> Please observe the policy on open item ownership[1] and send a status update
>> >> within three calendar days of this message.  Include a date for your
>> >> subsequent status update.
>> >
>> > Okay, so our consensus is to always set the priorities of sync standbys
>> > to 1 in quorum-based syncrep case. Attached patch does this change.
>> > Barrying any objection, I will commit this.
>>
>> +1
>
> Ok, +1 from me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
Следующее
От: Rui Hai Jiang
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] question: data file update when pg_basebackup in progress