On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I can see a usecase for having a pg_size_pretty(numeric) as an option.
>>>> Not necessarily a very big one, but a >0 one.
>>>
>>> +1.
>>
>> +1, too.
>
> I did some beautification of this patch. I think the attached version
> is cleaner and easier to read. Thoughts?
Looks good to me. Thanks for polishing the patch!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao