Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwFYAZzq5cwgKSssiHMUrGdDi7uEYgVeC1BqWL6tEaEt1Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> How common *is* it to have a build that doesn't have integer timestamps
>> these days? Does any of the binary builds do that at all, for example? If
>> it's uncommon enough, I think we should just go with the easy way out...
>
> +1 for just rejecting a mismatch.

Agreed.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value