On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Portability fix for commit 9a895462d.
>
> So far as I can find, NI_MAXHOST isn't actually required anywhere by
> POSIX. Nonetheless, commit 9a895462d supposed that it could rely on
> having that symbol without any ceremony at all. We do have a hack
> for providing it if the platform doesn't, in getaddrinfo.h, so fix
> the problem by #including that file. Per buildfarm.
Thanks for fixing my mistake.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao