On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as
>> synchronous_commit = remote_write rather than just synchronous_commit
>> = write. Actually, the internal constant is named that way already,
>> but it's not exposed as such to the user.
>
> That's something to discuss at the end of the CF when people are less
> busy and we get more input.
>
> It's an easy change whatever we decide to do.
Added this to 9.2 Open Items.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center