Re: [HACKERS] invalid combination of options "-D - -F t -X stream" in pg_basebackup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: [HACKERS] invalid combination of options "-D - -F t -X stream" in pg_basebackup
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwEi-m74E2iKqhuAcsAcxHM21Nk52bmq-ch1OjsUX6aWkg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] invalid combination of options "-D - -F t -X stream" in pg_basebackup  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Isn't it better to forbid the conbination of the options "-D -", "-F t"
>> >> and
>> >> "-X stream" in pg_basebackup? This is obviously invalid setting and the
>> >> docs
>> >> warns this as follows. But currently users can specify such setting and
>> >> pg_basebackup can exit unexpectedly with an error.
>> >>
>> >> -----------------------
>> >> If the value - (dash) is specified as target directory, the tar
>> >> contents
>> >> will
>> >> be written to standard output, suitable for piping to for example gzip.
>> >> This is only possible if the cluster has no additional tablespaces.
>> >> -----------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, definitely. I'd say that's an oversight in implementing the support
>> > for
>> > stream-to-tar that it did not detect this issue.
>> >
>> > Do you want to provide a patch for it, or should I?
>>
>> What about the attached patch?
>>
>> +        fprintf(stderr, _("Try \"%s --help\" for more information.\n"),
>> +                progname);
>>
>> I added the above hint message because other codes checking invalid
>> options also have such hint messages. But there is no additional
>> useful information about valid combination of options in the help
>> messages, so I'm a bit tempted to remove the above hint message.
>
>
> Looks good to me.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.

I left the hint message for consistency with other code.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joel Jacobson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SET NOT NULL [NOT VALID / CONCURRENTLY]?
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins