Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAHGQGwEG4zTBPr+R8+Xi7k8d8GR77xDNGSW0H8fG49E9dZLiaQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench (Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 9:07 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote: > If you put this explanation to the inline comment, things would get clearer. But based on this explanation, I just gotthe other doubt. When a pipeline is aborted, res is NULL, but we still stay in the for loop, PQClear(res) will do nothing,then the “for” loop is similar to an empty loop, would that lead to a high CPU usage? From this perspective, whenpipeline is aborted, while waiting for PIPELINE_SYNC, adding a tiny sleep might be better. You're concerned about cases where the server response is delayed, causing the pipeline status to take time to reach PIPELINE_SYNC, right? In that situation, since discardAvailableResults() waits on PQgetResult(), it shouldn't enter a busy loop, correct? > I will back to work next Monday, then I will try to run a test and reproduce the scenario of pipeline abort. I plan to commit the patch soon, but let's keep discussing and investigating the case you mentioned afterward! Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: