Re: Option to ensure monotonic timestamps

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brent Kerby
Тема Re: Option to ensure monotonic timestamps
Дата
Msg-id CAH8WVshXhUcsCytOqJwinbgF2QFF+BSNDEyc3w_t2JbVQmRvfg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Option to ensure monotonic timestamps  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
The issue is that presence of timestamps is fundamental to the functionality of temporal tables. The users need to.be able to make queries on temporal tables in terms of timestamps; LSNs won't mean anything to them. It would be an option to implement the temporal tables using LSNs under the hood, but then it is still required to construct a monotonic mapping between LSNs and timestamps in order for it to be usable. The most natural method for constructing such a mapping would be to use the stored commit timestamps; if these are monotonic, then that works, but we gain little by storing the LSNs, since they will just be converted to timestamps anyway when they're used. But if the timestamps aren't monotonic, then we're faced with the same problem as before; we could try to patch up the non-monotonicity in the mapping after-the-fact, using clamping or possibly some more sophisticated method, but this is inefficient and could get ugly fast. It would seem preferable to just ensure that the timestamps are monotonic to begin with. And based on your observations of why we shouldn't try to enforce this on every application of GetCurrentTimestamp, I think maybe it would be cleaner to just enforce this on commit timestamps (and only if enabled by a configuration option, of course), since this is all that is needed and should be simpler and less expensive. And if a violation occurs, we can just abort the transaction with an error, rather than clamping the timestamp. This way we don't end up with an ugly scenario like you pointed out, where we have one set of timestamps that are clamped (i.e., for commit timestamps) and others that are not; and also this way, if the $idiotsysadmin sets the clock back an hour, then we get errors immediately instead of a whole hour of temporal table history being messed up.

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-02-20 12:32:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The "global" variable would actually need to be cluster-wide, ie in shared
>> memory, which would imply contention and the need for locks.  I think the
>> overhead of this would be mighty high, and the return pretty low.

> I think if we wanted to go for something like this (which I doubt), we'd
> have that global variable as an atomic 64bit variable in shmem, and
> *only* use it for stuff where the ordering actually matters. I.e. not
> for transaction start times etc...

Then you've got problems with figuring out which usages "matter" and which
don't, and being sure you don't ever compare timestamps from the two
different sources.  Seems mighty fragile to me, and reminiscent of the
replication problems that forced us to drop support for float timestamps.

In any case I'd not much like a system that mostly reported in system
clock time except transaction commit timestamps are on some other
timescale.

But really, the killer point here is your upthread comment that even if
GetCurrentTimestamp were guaranteed to return monotonic time, that would
not guarantee that commit timestamps match physical commit order, which
was the OP's goal.  At least not unless we read the clock while holding
WALWriteLock, which I'm pretty sure everyone will say Ain't Happening.

I think your not-very-explicit suggestion that he should work in
commit LSNs, not timestamps at all, is a far superior answer.

                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN fast default