Re: Problem with logical replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Euler Taveira
Тема Re: Problem with logical replication
Дата
Msg-id CAH503wCfFxUS_VZhFEAfXvKJNgkYVOexfsDFiYDyLQTU3dOC4g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Problem with logical replication  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Problem with logical replication  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 02:47, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

Agreed.  I don't think either that we need to update this comment.  I
was playing with this patch and what you have here looks fine by me.
Two nits: the extra parenthesis in the assert are not necessary, and
the indentation had some diffs.  Tom has just reindented the whole
tree, so let's keep things clean.


LGTM.


--
Euler Taveira                 http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg13: xlogreader API adjust
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions