Re: Invisible Indexes
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Invisible Indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-WznxfM4hgErzgHTwxqDj-++s9TRMthsXzP2SwmySi+cHEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Invisible Indexes (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> wrote: > If we want to test the effect of disabling an index, we could set GUC > only on the current session. DDL will make the index invisible > immediately. Things can go worse after that. I prefer the former. It > is more conservative but could confuse users if the effect is not > immediate (few words could explain cached plans x invisible indexes). If we're going to go that way, then we better not call them invisible indexes. Invisible indexes are generally understood to be indexes that are "invisible" to everyone -- not just the current session. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: