Re: _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData()
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wznr4tjtfbyoqT4xYQ6FOsnsbcjo7F4w4xbB7-OxJS+=-g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на _bt_delitems_delete() should use XLogRegisterBufData(), not XLogRegisterData()  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:00 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Attached patch shows what I have in mind. The new comment block has
> been copied from _bt_delitems_vacuum().

I also think that the WAL record and function signature of
_bt_delitems_delete() should be brought closer to
_bt_delitems_vacuum(). Attached patch does it that way.

I intend to commit this in the next day or two, barring any objections.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf
Следующее
От: cary huang
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq