Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only?
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WznoOL3jNoddubduuQrxNH3=-nDq3m9u-d-vxpVPRYBi2w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: should vacuum's first heap pass be read-only?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Yes, that's what I meant. That's always how I thought that it would work, for over a year now. I might have jumped to the conclusion that that's what you had in mind all along. Oops.

Although this design is simpler, which is an advantage, that's not really the point. The  point is that it makes sense, and that extra concurrent with pruning heap vacuuming doesn't seem useful at all.
--
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactoring the regression tests for more independence