Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzne04i1GWFJpxCVdi2dySUkzbTv=sf+VzYwQkku2mhkag@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> So you're asking for something like bt_index_check_heap() +
>> bt_index_parent_check_heap()? Or, are you talking about function
>> overloading?
>
> The latter. That addresses my concerns about dropping the function and
> causing issues due to dependencies.

WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification