Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WznZ6_nsLyC8cDb2BicRSQ-Ldyd=d2Kivpx2YSp_5mtwPw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:19 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Replacing random() might actually make that easier not harder, since
> we'd have more control over what happens when.

That does seem useful. I'm in favor. But why does the function to seed
the internal PRNG have to be loadable? Can't it just be
superuser-only?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: random() (was Re: New GUC to sample log queries)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views