Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WznWMWdoCO5_Qs8pG_20oGChiysu3Jb251u7arspQf+xCA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> Postgres crashes:
>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(((const void*)(&isNull) != ((void*)0)) && (scankey->sk_attno) > 0)", File: "nbtsearch.c",
Line:466)
 
>>
>> May be I'm doing something wrong or amcheck support will go with different patch?
>
> Usually amcheck complaining is a sign of other symptoms. I am marking
> this patch as returned with feedback for now as no updates have been
> provided after two weeks.

It looks like amcheck needs to be patched -- a simple oversight.
amcheck is probably calling _bt_compare() without realizing that
internal pages don't have the extra attributes (just leaf pages,
although they should also not participate in comparisons in respect of
included/extra columns). There were changes to amcheck at one point in
the past. That must have slipped through again. I don't think it's
that complicated.

BTW, it would probably be a good idea to use the new Github version's
"heapallindexed" verification [1] for testing this patch. Anastasia
will need to patch the externally maintained amcheck to do this, but
it's probably no extra work, because this is already needed for
contrib/amcheck, and because the heapallindexed check doesn't actually
care about index structure at all.

[1] https://github.com/petergeoghegan/amcheck#optional-heapallindexed-verification
-- 
Peter Geoghegan


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: scan-build plpython stuff