Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn76eCGUonARy-wrVtMHsf+4cvbK_oJAWTLfORTU5ki0w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.
>
> I might as well post this one first. I'll have 0002 for you in a short while.

Looks like thrips doesn't like this, though other Windows buildfarm
animals are okay with it.

round() is from C99, apparently. I'll investigate a fix.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Anthony Iliopoulos
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification