Re: [HACKERS] Boom filters for hash joins (was: A design for amcheckheapam verification)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Boom filters for hash joins (was: A design for amcheckheapam verification)
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn+xeU+CsrinrSBj014zmKCicbccAn-WmRe=Xx_VuFBpQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Boom filters for hash joins (was: A design for amcheckheapam verification)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Boom filters for hash joins (was: A design for amcheckheapam verification)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The patch is fairly simple, and did not try to push the bloom filters to
> scan nodes or anything like that. It might be a meaningful first step,
> though, particularly for selective joins (where only small number of
> rows from the outer relation has a match in the hash table).

I believe that parallelism makes the use of Bloom filter a lot more
compelling, too. Obviously this is something that wasn't taken into
consideration in 2015.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: 'Bruce Momjian'
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Perform only oneReadControlFile() during startup.