Re: Lock contention high

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Lock contention high
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmuTpFGmFwyuBC09LmOavYcx9jqbOQOoB6ivS75m=aO_A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Lock contention high  (Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 6:54 PM Jeremy Schneider
<schneider@ardentperf.com> wrote:
> only a half GB memory for autovac? (it will have a mandatory run as soon
> as you hit 200 mil XIDs, seems like you'd want the full max 1GB for it)

While anti-wraparound vacuums will become a problem for TPC-C (unless
you tune for it), it's not too sensitive to mwm. You just don't end up
accumulating too many TIDs to delete from indexes in practice, even
though the overhead from VACUUM is a concern. The new autovacuum
instrumentation in Postgres 14 makes this far clearer.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeremy Schneider
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lock contention high
Следующее
От: Ashkil Dighin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lock contention high