On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> One argument I can think of is that it is confusing right now. Why is
>> there de-AT but no de-DE? I know why, but users in "DE" might not and
>> would be really confused. So I concede that adding the full set would
>> be useful.
>
> Actually, there would be a de-DE. Just like with de-BE, that's ensured
> by using locales rather than collations. See my self-contained test
> program, or even the output I posted earlier.
I just realized that I misunderstood you here.
Anyway, I'm glad that we're in agreement that adding every locale at
initdb time would be the most useful behavior.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs