Re: new commitfest transition guidance
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzmjoXAJmovkaRNHKA1YcAaqFpebbVjkUExmQ_wzVPvdRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: new commitfest transition guidance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 8:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > As of right now, I see that 79 CF entries have been manually pushed to > 2025-03 (but it's hard to tell how many of those were moved before > 2025-01 closed). 180 live entries are still in 2025-01, including > 20 RfC ones. I think this experiment is already proving to be a > failure, and if you increase the cost of compliance substantially, > people just won't do it at all. Evidently this new policy is why my skip scan patch series wasn't being tested by CI. I just don't think that this new policy makes sense. At least not as implemented. Do we all now need to set ourselves reminders to re-enter patches to each CF, lest we be accused of abandoning patches due to a lack of interest? -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: