Re: use SIMD in GetPrivateRefCountEntry()
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: use SIMD in GetPrivateRefCountEntry() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-WzmeoT8O1EZ7EPv26JoEt4tEQoRBMvyP6aCgG5ZBXRa5yg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: use SIMD in GetPrivateRefCountEntry() (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 4:32 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > I was unable to notice any improvements in any of the microbenchmarks > that I've been using to test the index prefetching patch set. For > whatever reason, these test cases are neither improved nor regressed > by your patch series. Correction: appears to be a regression at higher client counts with standard pgbench SELECT + the index prefetching patchset + your v2 patchset. Not a massive one (about a 5% loss in TPS/throughput), and not one that I can reproduce at lower client counts. There are 16 physical cores on this machine, and that seems to be around the cutoff for getting these regressions. I've disabled turboboost and typerthreading on this machine, since I find that that leads to more consistent performance, at least at lower client counts. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: