On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It looks good to me. The only real objection would be if someone came
> up with a test case proving that there's a significant performance
> degradation from the extra copies. But given that these are back
> branches, it would take a pretty steep penalty for me to want to take
> the risk of refactoring to avoid that.
>
> I've pushed it with some cosmetic adjustments.
Thank you, Tom.
--
Peter Geoghegan