Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 11:32 PM Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If you can show more about dead_items, then it will either confirm or
>> disprove my theory about it being the same issue.
>
>
> (gdb) p *vacrel->dead_items
> $2 = {max_items = 11184809, num_items = 0, items = 0x7fa22f48d048}
> (gdb) p *vacrel->dead_items->items
> $3 = {ip_blkid = {bi_hi = 0, bi_lo = 0}, ip_posid = 1}
>
> The num_items is zero.

That is what I suspected. And so the issue you see looks exactly the
same as the one that I saw when debugging a production instance.

--
Peter Geoghegan