On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:40 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> Ants and Andres suggested to replace the spinlock used in pgss_store() with
> LWLock. I agreed with them and posted the POC patch doing that. But I think
> the patch is an item for v14. The patch may address the reported performance
> issue, but may cause other performance issues in other workloads. We would
> need to measure how the patch affects the performance in various workloads.
> It seems too late to do that at this stage of v13. Thought?
I agree that it's too late for v13.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan