Re: Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmXEUV5MjQ+iuMVe1Fh7_b9SaQ+uwdGGoe74xiU-OhY-g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6  (Ted Filmore <pilepiper@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Ted Filmore <pilepiper@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I am really asking to confirm is after describing the situation is it
> reasonable to focus on (in the short term) tuning autovacuum to increase
> performance or does this not make sense given the workload and I should look
> elsewhere?

I would look into this suspected 9.5 regression, if that's possible:

https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=SfAKVMv1x9Jh19EJ8am8TZn9f-yECipS9HrrRqSswnA@mail.gmail.com

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ted Filmore
Дата:
Сообщение: Autovacuum behavior with rapid insert/delete 9.6
Следующее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dblink: could not send query: another command is already inprogress