Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmUnA-jxDQKcz+nAGEkT4D0mW-yS2Rg-ss72b43Uo3S3w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'm generally OK with most of this - I'd probably keep the single-line
> format, but I don't feel very strongly about that and if others think
> using two lines is better ...
>
> Barring objections I'll get this polished and pushed soon-ish (say,
> early next week).

I see something about starting a new thread on the Open Items page.
Please CC me on this.

Speaking in my capacity as an RMT member: Glad to see that you plan to
close this item out next week. (I had planned on giving you a nudge
about this, but it looks like I don't really have to now.)

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS?
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?