On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Rushabh Lathia
<rushabh.lathia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I haven't touched the randomAccess part yet. My initial goal was
> to incorporate the BufFileSet api's here.
This is going to need a rebase, due to the commit today to remove
replacement selection sort. That much should be easy.
> Sorry, I didn't get this part. Are you talking about the your patch changes
> into OpenTemporaryFileInTablespace(), BufFileUnify() and other changes
> related to ltsUnify() ? If that's the case, I don't think it require with
> the
> BufFileSet. Correct me if I am wrong here.
I thought that you'd have multiple BufFiles, which would be
multiplexed (much like a single BufFile itself mutiplexes 1GB
segments), so that logtape.c could still recycle space in the
randomAccess case. I guess that that's not a goal now.
> To be frank its too early for me to comment anything in this area. I need
> to study this more closely. As an initial goal I was just focused on
> understanding the current implementation of the patch and incorporate
> the BufFileSet APIs.
Fair enough.
--
Peter Geoghegan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers