Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?
От
Peter Geoghegan
Тема
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?
Дата
Msg-id
CAH2-WzmPZC2HAXj5jiyhP-Z5tr0OD_ThcMyTy1pSaL-HtdZ15Q@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 5:05 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, I'd be fine with that, although the disconnect between the type > name and the comment terminology might confuse some people. Maybe, but the fact that the ItemIdData struct consists of bit fields that are all named "lp_*" offers a hint. Plus you have the LP_* constants that get stored in ItemIdData.lp_flags. I wouldn't call the struct ItemIdData if I was in a green field situation, but it doesn't seem too bad under the present circumstances. I'd rather not change the struct's name, because that would probably cause problems without any real benefit. OTOH, calling two closely related but distinct things by the same name is atrocious. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата: