Re: Update comments in multixact.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Update comments in multixact.c
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzmM_G9O1QFbY_ixA5bwRqHhfXtav5BpbEb+H3Gfyxg=Nw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Update comments in multixact.c  ("shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com" <shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com>)
Ответы RE: Update comments in multixact.c
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com
<shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c because
> SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be
> changed, too?

Yes, I think so.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melanie Plageman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation