Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzm87JWi92OgsuFaGcOb=R4tXR_joZQnqh56u9G1-PFCqA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:06 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:56 AM Alexander Korotkov
> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > Thank you.  2nd patch is proposed for master and makes btree page
> > unlink remove all the items from the page being deleted.
>
> This looks good, but can we do the
> wal_consistency_checking/btree_mask() improvement, too?

You never got around to committing the second patch (or the
wal_consistency_checking stuff). Are you planning on picking it up
again?

I'm currently working on this bug fix from Michail Nikolaev:

https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0ohkR-evAWbpzJu54V8eCOtqjJyYp3PQ_SGoBTRGXWhWRw@mail.gmail.com

It would be nice if you could commit your second patch at around the
same time. It's related IMV.

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comment simplehash/dynahash trade-offs
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] - Provide robust alternatives for replace_string