Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzksOK6mrNrRmgPeyvZRJu-tuSZpjbfamjqR56MbUP61Dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17245: Index corruption involving deduplicated entries
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 3:11 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:35 PM K. R. <iijima.yun@koumakan.jp> wrote: > > $ ./pg_amcheck -U postgres --heapallindexed --parent-check --rootdescend > > azurlane_wiki > > btree index "azurlane_wiki.mediawiki.page_redirect_namespace_len": > > ERROR: posting list contains misplaced TID in index > > "page_redirect_namespace_len" > > DETAIL: Index tid=(14,9) posting list offset=110 page lsn=2/2C4F7CD8. > > btree index "azurlane_wiki.mediawiki.page_len": > > ERROR: posting list contains misplaced TID in index "page_len" > > DETAIL: Index tid=(1,2) posting list offset=34 page lsn=2/2DDA2378. > > btree index "azurlane_wiki.mediawiki.transcode_key_idx": > > ERROR: posting list contains misplaced TID in index > > "transcode_key_idx" > > DETAIL: Index tid=(1,9) posting list offset=5 page lsn=2/2B53AED8. Does it make any difference if you run "./pg_amcheck -U postgres --heapallindexed azurlane_wiki" instead? Typically I would expect this to be less interesting, because you're asking pg_amcheck to do less checking. But this is not a typical case. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: