Re: bt Scankey in another contradictory case

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: bt Scankey in another contradictory case
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkhDxA2dthK5sPiC1=QueCeTOSytfgBhmFYhkoYVOzcOg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на bt Scankey in another contradictory case  ("bigbro_wq@hotmail.com" <bigbro_wq@hotmail.com>)
Ответы Re: bt Scankey in another contradictory case
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 7:36 AM b ro <bigbro_wq@hotmail.com> wrote:
>       this is the patch attachment.

We discussed this recently:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/80384.1715458896%40sss.pgh.pa.us

I think that we should do this.

It doesn't make a huge difference in practice, because we'll still end
the scan once the leaf level is reached. But it matters more when
array keys are involved, where there might be more than one descent to
the leaf level. Plus we might as well just be thorough about this
stuff.

--
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: