Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wzk_p0G=6v=pZ+iiu0cW0C+tJ__ZQwz_DiJziVZH1SBxRw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:09 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> Like anything, we make the decision at the time we have a reason to
> break something. But why are are exensions disfavored in this
> calculation vs. in-core? Isn't it a lot easier to update in-core code
> to new APIs?

We don't really have an API for how TIDs behave (unless you happen to
want to emulate heapam, which is reasonable and was expected). It's
unspecified because nobody knows what it is (or what it should be)
just yet. AFAICT there is no TID API to break.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY table_name (single_column) FROM 'iso-8859-1.txt' DELIMITER E'\n'
Следующее
От: Matthias van de Meent
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MaxOffsetNumber for Table AMs