Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkScZv5D_18C6fTBwRmON8mCv65kZ6BD1ReouPk-Q=Wyg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:35 PM Mark Dilger
<mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Reading this thread, I think the lack of a performance impact on laptop hardware was expected, but perhaps
confirmationthat it does not make things worse is useful?
 
>
> Since this patch doesn't seem to do any harm, I would mark it as "ready for committer", except that there doesn't yet
seemto be enough evidence that it is a net win.
 

Thank you for testing my patch. Sorry for the delay in getting back to this.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RE: Delaying/avoiding BTreeTupleGetNAtts() call within _bt_compare()
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch