Re: GiST VACUUM

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: GiST VACUUM
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkE8tKc4pH5SXD+fa0ZC18hJrYOu0CYqhgE1TM2jEYFEQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GiST VACUUM  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:33 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> That's probably how it's going to go, but hey, doesn't hurt to ask :-).

I think that it would be fine to be conservative with nbtree, and only
target the master branch. The problem is annoying, certainly, but it's
not likely to make a huge difference for most real world workloads.
OTOH, perhaps the risk is so low that we might as well target
backbranches.

How do you feel about it?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST VACUUM
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case