Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-WzkCuqk+AXA=QuEcVBJEOhG7GLoymw=9fYsY5w=iGp6XjQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:23 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> So IIUC the issue here is that the code could previously record useless
> collation version dependencies in somes cases, which could lead to false
> positive possible corruption messages (and of course additional bloat on
> pg_depend).  False positive messages can't be avoided anyway, as a collation
> version update may not corrupt the actually indexed set of data, especially for
> glibc.

This argument seems completely absurd to me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windows default locale vs initdb